Impugnación pregunta 49
Publicado: 25 May 2006, 22:41
Creo que esta pregunta es impugnable. La exposición de la impugnación sería como sigue:
Consultada la RFC 3550 donde se define el protocolo RTP, en su cuarto párrafo del capítulo “1 Introduction” dice textualmente:
This document defines RTP, consisting of two closely-linked parts:
• the real-time transport protocol (RTP), to carry data that has real-time properties.
• the RTP control protocol (RTCP), to monitor the quality of service and to convey information about the participants in an on-going session. The latter aspect of RTCP may be sufficient for "loosely controlled" sessions, i.e., where there is no explicit membership control and set-up, but it is not necessarily intended to support all of an application's control communication requirements. This functionality may be fully or partially subsumed by a separate session control protocol, which is beyond the scope of this document.
Es decir, entendiendo, como interpreta el IETF, que RTCP es parte de RTP, RTP si realiza una monitorización de calidad de servicio, no pudiendo considerarse como NO cierta la opción a).
Consultada la RFC 3550 donde se define el protocolo RTP, en su cuarto párrafo del capítulo “1 Introduction” dice textualmente:
This document defines RTP, consisting of two closely-linked parts:
• the real-time transport protocol (RTP), to carry data that has real-time properties.
• the RTP control protocol (RTCP), to monitor the quality of service and to convey information about the participants in an on-going session. The latter aspect of RTCP may be sufficient for "loosely controlled" sessions, i.e., where there is no explicit membership control and set-up, but it is not necessarily intended to support all of an application's control communication requirements. This functionality may be fully or partially subsumed by a separate session control protocol, which is beyond the scope of this document.
Es decir, entendiendo, como interpreta el IETF, que RTCP es parte de RTP, RTP si realiza una monitorización de calidad de servicio, no pudiendo considerarse como NO cierta la opción a).